IQAC · Quality Enhancement

Feedback System

A structured multi-stakeholder feedback mechanism covering students, teachers, employers, alumni, parents and event delegates — evaluated on standardised scales to drive continuous quality improvement.

6
Feedback Types
1–5
Rating Scale
1999
Estd. Year
NAAC
Accredited 'B'
Overview

Feedback System at the Institute

ASPM's K .T. Patil College of Pharmacy, Dharashiv was established in 1999 with the mission to develop an evolving educational system with optimum infrastructure, competent manpower, and appropriate industry interaction — generating globally competitive pharmacists as entrepreneurs, skilled technocrats, researchers, and healthcare professionals.

The feedback from stakeholders helps the institute understand societal needs and expectations. The feedback system covers six categories of stakeholders, each assessed with a structured questionnaire and a defined rating scale, ensuring actionable, evidence-based improvements.

Feedback Categories at a Glance

Student Feedback
Students
Twice (B. Pharm)
Teacher Feedback
Teaching Staff
Once per year
Employer Feedback
Employers
As applicable
Alumni Feedback
Alumni
As applicable
Parents Feedback
Parents
During parent meeting
Guest Lecture / Seminar Feedback
Students / Staff / Delegates
As per the activity
Process

How Feedback is Processed

STEP 01

Feedback Committee

Principal, Academic Coordinator & Subject In-Charge plan and oversee the entire feedback process.

STEP 02

Planning & Collection

Feedback forms are distributed to the relevant stakeholders at scheduled intervals throughout the academic year.

STEP 03

Feedback Analysis

Responses are evaluated on a scale of 1–5 (Best to Poor) to produce quantitative scores per criterion.

STEP 04

Analysis Report

A consolidated analysis report is prepared criterion-wise and shared with the IQAC and management.

STEP 05

Action Taken Report

Specific corrective and improvement actions are recorded and implemented based on feedback outcomes.

Standard Evaluation Scale (Student Academic Feedback)
5Best
4Good
3Average
2Below Average
1Poor
Summary

Feedback Coverage Matrix

Sr.Feedback TypeFrequencyObjectiveStakeholders
1Faculty FeedbackOnceDepartmental feedbackTeaching Staffs
2Academic FeedbackTwice (B.Pharm) / Once (Pharm D)Teaching LearningStudents
3Alumni FeedbackAs applicableAlumni satisfaction feedback / suggestionAlumni
4Employer FeedbackAs applicablePerformance of students in industryEmployer
5Parents FeedbackDuring parent meetingParent satisfactionParents
6Guest Lecture / SeminarAs per activityDelegate feedback about activityStudents / Staff / Delegates

Explore IQAC Resources

Review AQAR reports, IQAC meeting minutes, and annual quality assurance documentation that reflect our continuous commitment to institutional excellence.